SEO Nav Menu — Fully Responsive (Fixed)
Core Web Vitals Statistics 2026: Pass Rates, LCP/INP/CLS & Revenue Data | SEOScaleUp
SEO Statistics · Updated July 2026

Core Web Vitals Statistics 2026: Pass Rates, Threshold Changes, and the Revenue Behind Every 0.1 Second

Google tightened the “Good” LCP threshold from 2.5s to 2.0s in March 2026 and quietly promoted INP to an equal ranking signal — and most sites haven’t re-checked their scores since. Here’s the full 2026 data: global pass rates, the mobile-desktop gap, and the case-study numbers that prove speed is a revenue metric, not just an SEO one.

2026 Core Web Vitals Pass Rates Share of web origins scoring “Good,” May 2026 CrUX data
All three metrics (overall)
55.9%
LCP — Largest Contentful Paint
68.6%
CLS — Cumulative Layout Shift
81.3%
INP — Interaction to Next Paint
86.6%
Mobile origins, all three
42–49%

Dotted line marks the 75% “most sites pass” reference point. Sources: DigitalApplied (May 2026 CrUX release), Whitehat SEO, HTTP Archive Web Almanac 2025, SHNO.co — full list below.

0Of web origins pass all three CWV metrics
0New “Good” LCP threshold, down from 2.5s
0Conversion lift per 0.1s of load time saved
0Max ranking drop for LCP over 2.5s
0Pass-rate gap: Next.js vs. default WordPress
Why This Matters Now

Google Just Moved the Goalposts — And Most Sites Haven’t Checked

Core Web Vitals have been a ranking factor since June 2021, but the March 2026 core update quietly rewrote the rules more than any update since the original rollout. If your site’s LCP measured 2.3 seconds before March 2026 and nobody re-checked it, that site went from passing to failing without a single line of code changing.

Two changes drove that shift. Google tightened the “Good” LCP threshold from 2.5 seconds down to 2.0 seconds, meaning anything between 2.0s and 2.5s — a zone that used to be a comfortable pass — now sits in “Needs Improvement.” At the same time, INP moved from a supplementary, secondary signal to an equal ranking factor alongside LCP and CLS, confirmed by Google Search Central on March 18, 2026.

The rest of this piece walks through what the current pass-rate data actually says, what the March threshold change cost sites that didn’t adapt, and — because performance is ultimately a business metric — the revenue numbers behind every 0.1 second of load time.

The Headline Numbers

How Many Websites Actually Pass Core Web Vitals in 2026?

As of the most recent Chrome User Experience Report (CrUX) release in May 2026, 55.9% of all tracked web origins pass all three Core Web Vitals simultaneously — CrUX measured over 18.4 million origins that month. That’s up from roughly 53% in September 2025, about 50% in early 2024, and just 36% back in 2022, showing steady but incomplete progress across the open web.

Passing “all three simultaneously” is the strict bar — a site with excellent CLS and INP but poor LCP still fails the overall assessment. Individually, the May 2026 metric-level pass rates were 68.6% good LCP, 81.3% good CLS, and 86.6% good INP — which makes LCP clearly the hardest metric to pass and the highest-leverage one to fix first.

Pass Rate Trend, 2022–2026

Share of origins passing all three Core Web Vitals

2022
36%
Early 2024
~50%
Sept 2025
53%
May 2026
55.9%
Sources: SHNO.co Core Web Vitals Statistics 2026; Addy Osmani (2025 CrUX analysis); DigitalApplied.
What Changed

The March 2026 Threshold Change, Explained in One Table

This is the update that quietly failed sites that hadn’t touched their performance budget in over a year.

MetricOld “Good” threshold2026 “Good” thresholdWhat changed
LCP≤ 2.5s≤ 2.0sTightened; the 2.0–2.5s zone moved into “Needs Improvement”
INPSecondary signalEqual ranking signalPromoted to the same weight as LCP and CLS
CLS≤ 0.1≤ 0.1Unchanged — still the most-passed metric

The ranking consequences were immediate and measurable. Sites with LCP above 2.5 seconds saw average ranking drops of 2 to 4 positions on competitive queries, according to DigitalApplied’s March 2026 analysis. Sites sitting in the INP “Needs Improvement” range (above 200ms) saw a smaller but still measurable average drop of 0.8 positions.

Google’s own Search Central documentation frames all three metrics around one real-user-experience question: does the page load fast, respond quickly, and stay visually stable? What changed in March wasn’t the question — it was how strict the “yes” answer needs to be.

Ranking Impact of Missing Thresholds

Average position drop on competitive queries, March 2026

LCP above 2.5s
2–4 positions
INP above 200ms
0.8 positions
Source: DigitalApplied, “Schema Markup After March 2026” and Core Web Vitals analysis, March–April 2026.
The Widening Divide

The Mobile vs. Desktop Gap Is Where the Money Is

Pass Rate by Device Type

Share of origins passing all three Core Web Vitals, 2026

Desktop
56–63%
Mobile
42–49%
Mobile share of ecommerce traffic
62%
Ranges reflect differing methodologies across HTTP Archive Web Almanac and DigitalApplied/BloggersIdeas datasets, both 2026. Read as directional, not a single precise figure.

Depending on the dataset, mobile pass rates sit somewhere between 42% and 49%, against a desktop range of 56% to 63% — an 8-to-20-point gap depending on methodology, but consistently in the same direction across every source checked for this piece. LCP is the metric driving most of that gap, since mobile devices and networks make the largest content element slower to paint by default.

That gap concentrates exactly where the revenue stakes are highest: mobile now accounts for roughly 62% of all ecommerce traffic, yet mobile ecommerce conversion rates run at only about half of desktop’s — roughly 2% versus 4% across published benchmark indexes. A slow mobile experience isn’t a minor inconvenience for half the funnel; it’s friction on the majority of the traffic with the lowest baseline conversion rate already.

The Business Case

Every 0.1 Seconds Is Money: The Conversion Data

This is the section to forward to whoever controls the performance budget. Every figure below comes from a named company or a named joint study, not a general industry estimate.

8.4%

The Google/Deloitte baseline

A joint Deloitte and Google study found that a 0.1-second improvement in page load time increased retail conversion rates by 8.4% and average order value by 9.2%. In travel, the conversion lift per 0.1 second rises to around 10%.

+53.4%

Rakuten 24

An A/B test isolating Core Web Vitals as the only variable found good LCP scores produced a 33.1% increase in conversion rate and a 53.4% increase in revenue per visitor.

+8%

Vodafone Italy

Improving LCP by 31% — through server-side rendering and reduced render-blocking JavaScript — produced an 8% increase in sales.

+7%

RedBus

Improving INP specifically (independent of LCP or CLS changes) produced a 7% increase in sales, isolating responsiveness as a direct revenue driver.

+101%

Ray-Ban

Using the Speculation Rules API to prerender key pages more than doubled mobile conversion rates on product pages, up 101.47%.

+42%

Swappie

A 23% reduction in load time was tied to a 42% increase in mobile revenue in a case study cited by SiteBuilderReport.

Scaled up, the math gets serious: for a $10M-a-year ecommerce site, a 500ms improvement in load time translates to roughly $500,000 in recovered annual revenue, based on aggregated A/B test data across thousands of sites. A simpler rule of thumb from the same research: every 100ms of load time costs approximately 1% in conversions.

Does It Actually Move Rankings?

The SEO Correlation: Faster Pages, Higher Positions

Correlation isn’t causation, and Google has been consistent that Core Web Vitals are one signal among many, not a guaranteed rankings lever on their own. That said, the directional data is hard to ignore: pages ranking in position 1 of Google Search are about 10% more likely to pass Core Web Vitals thresholds than pages sitting at position 9 on the same results page.

Platform choice compounds the effect at scale. Framework-based platforms like Next.js — with automatic code splitting, built-in image optimization, and server-side rendering — outperform default WordPress installations by roughly 20 percentage points on pass rate. WordPress sites can close that gap with careful optimization, but the default experience, often running 20–30 plugins on an unoptimized theme, starts from a real disadvantage.

CMS / Platform Pass Rate Gap

Illustrative comparison based on 2026 platform benchmark data

Framework-based (e.g. Next.js)
Higher baseline
Default WordPress (20–30 plugins)
−20 pts
Source: DigitalApplied, Page Speed Statistics 2026 — CMS and platform benchmarks section.
Putting It Into Practice

8 Data-Backed Moves to Pass Core Web Vitals in 2026

01

Re-check LCP against the new 2.0s bar

Anything that passed at 2.3s before March 2026 is failing now. Re-run every template through PageSpeed Insights or CrUX before assuming last year’s audit still holds.

02

Treat INP as a first-class metric

Now that INP carries equal ranking weight, audit heavy JavaScript, third-party scripts, and event handlers that delay interaction response — not just page-load speed.

03

Fix mobile first, not last

With mobile pass rates trailing desktop by 8–20 points and carrying 62% of ecommerce traffic, prioritize mobile LCP and INP fixes over desktop polish.

04

Put a CDN in front of everything

A CDN can cut Time to First Byte from roughly 500ms to under 100ms for 90% of users on a geographically distributed audience — a direct, compounding LCP win.

05

Audit plugin and script bloat

The ~20-point gap between framework-based sites and default WordPress traces largely to plugin and JavaScript bloat. Every unnecessary script is a tax on both LCP and INP.

06

Reserve space for every dynamic element

CLS remains the most-passed metric (81.3%) precisely because layout-shift fixes — reserved space for images, ads, and banners — are well understood. Don’t let it slip while chasing LCP and INP.

07

Build the revenue case, not just the SEO case

Use the Rakuten, Vodafone, and RedBus numbers above to get performance work prioritized with stakeholders who don’t respond to ranking arguments alone.

08

Pair speed fixes with structured data

Faster pages and clean schema now compound for AI citations too. See our 2026 SEO statistics roundup and GEO & AEO statistics guide for the full picture.

Quick Answers

Frequently Asked Questions

What percentage of websites pass Core Web Vitals in 2026?

As of May 2026 CrUX data, 55.9% of all tracked web origins pass all three Core Web Vitals simultaneously. Individually, 68.6% pass LCP, 81.3% pass CLS, and 86.6% pass INP.

What changed with Core Web Vitals in March 2026?

Google tightened the “Good” LCP threshold from 2.5 seconds to 2.0 seconds and promoted INP from a secondary signal to an equal ranking factor alongside LCP and CLS. Sites with LCP above 2.5s saw average ranking drops of 2 to 4 positions on competitive queries.

Do Core Web Vitals actually affect conversion rates, not just rankings?

Yes. A joint Google and Deloitte study found a 0.1-second load-time improvement lifts retail conversion rates by 8.4%. Case studies go further: Rakuten 24 saw a 53.4% increase in revenue per visitor, and Vodafone Italy saw 8% more sales after improving LCP by 31%.

Why is the mobile Core Web Vitals pass rate so much lower than desktop?

Mobile pass rates run roughly 8 to 20 percentage points behind desktop depending on the dataset (42–49% vs. 56–63%), driven mostly by slower LCP on mobile networks and devices. This matters disproportionately because mobile carries about 62% of ecommerce traffic.

Does the CMS or platform I use affect my Core Web Vitals pass rate?

Significantly. Framework-based platforms like Next.js outperform default WordPress installations by roughly 20 percentage points on pass rate, largely due to automatic code splitting, built-in image optimization, and less plugin-driven script bloat.

Verify It Yourself

Sources & Further Reading

Every figure above traces back to one of the studies, datasets, or case studies below.

SEOScaleUp – Nav & Footer